Are Spiritual Gifts for Today? A Historical and Theological Timeline

The question of whether spiritual gifts—such as prophecy, healing, and speaking in tongues are still active today is one of the most enduring debates in Christian theology. Known as the debate between “cessationism” and “continuationism,” this issue has drawn interest from early church fathers to modern theologians. Some argue that the miraculous gifts ceased with the apostles, serving a specific purpose in the foundation of the church. Others believe these gifts continue today, evidenced by spiritual experiences across centuries.

I wanted to explore the historical development of these views, and draw from some of the early Christian writings, medieval theologians, and modern scholarship to tell the story of how Christian communities have understood the Holy Spirit’s work from the first century to the present. That’s no small feat I hear you say, well, it is a question that even in the early centuries they were grappling with and there were those sitting on both sides of the fence, just as they are today, but it is still a question worth asking, especially if you are anything like, feel reserved to use spiritual gifts in one sense when some well respected teachers/preachers say they no longer exist in todays church. So lets see where this leads us.


Tracing the Gifts Through Church History

In the late 1st century, documents like the Didache (an early Christian manual of teaching and practice based on the traditions of the Twelve Apostles) give us an early glimpse into how communities tested those claiming to speak on behalf of God. These believers lived with an expectation that God could speak and act through His people, but they also showed caution, emphasizing discernment. Some scholars speculate that bishops and deacons might have had prophetic functions, although this remains a matter of interpretation.

Around the same period, Ignatius of Antioch wrote his letters while being transported to Rome for execution. His writings focus on church unity and order, yet they also reflect a sensitivity to spiritual dynamics. While he doesn’t explicitly claim prophetic authority, some interpret his language; especially about divine guidance, as implying prophetic insight.

Moving into the early 2nd century, The Shepherd of Hermas offers a vivid example of prophetic literature. Its author records visions and conversations with angelic figures, suggesting that prophetic inspiration was still seen as a legitimate part of Christian life.

By the mid-2nd century, the Christian philosopher Justin Martyr described the continued presence of healing, prophecy, and teaching within the Church. He argued that these gifts, once found among the Jews, were now manifest in the Christian church, as a sign that the Spirit had departed from Israel due to unbelief; a theological perspective that also reflects a growing divide between Jewish and Gentile Christianity.

In the 170s AD, a more radical prophetic movement emerged: Montanism. Led by Montanus and the prophetesses Priscilla and Maximilla, this group emphasized ecstatic prophecy and the imminent return of Christ. Their style of prophecy, which was emotionally intense and God-controlled, differed from Paul’s more orderly model in 1 Corinthians 14. Though condemned as heretical by many early church leaders, Montanism testifies to the passionate desire among some Christians to see spiritual gifts flourish.

Responding to these movements, figures like Irenaeus of Lyons defended the continued operation of spiritual gifts. Writing against heresies, he listed examples of healings, exorcisms, visions, and even raising the dead. Irenaeus’s testimony carries some weight because of his widespread knowledge of Christian communities in both the East and West.

In the late 2nd to early 3rd century, the Apostolic Tradition, attributed to Hippolytus, describes ordination rituals and the expectation of spiritual empowerment for ministry. Though the text emphasizes order, it assumes that the Spirit is still actively at work.

The mid-3rd century introduces more voices: Novatian, a Roman theologian, affirms the presence of spiritual gifts in his Concerning the Trinity, and Cyprian of Carthage appeals to spiritual insight in his leadership. Dionysius of Alexandria, a disciple of Origen, recounts dreams and visions guiding him during persecution—further affirming that divine intervention was still believed to occur.

By the 4th and 5th centuries, views began to shift. While the Didache continued to hold influence in parts of the East, especially Egypt, Augustine of Hippo initially took a cessationist stance. However, later in life, especially in City of God, he acknowledged miracles occurring in his own time. His change of perspective adds depth to the conversation, showing that even theological giants revised their views on the Spirit’s activity.


Reformation and Beyond: A Shifting Landscape

The Reformation and its aftermath brought new theological frameworks, and with them, more formal arguments for cessationism. B.B. Warfield, writing in the 19th and early 20th centuries, powerfully articulated that miracles were tied to the apostolic era. Once the foundation was laid, he argued, such signs ceased, yet not all Reformers and Puritans followed this path. Richard Baxter, John Knox, and Samuel Rutherford demonstrated more openness to the Spirit’s ongoing work, showing that strict cessationism was not universal in early Reformed thought.

The 18th–21st centuries saw a dramatic resurgence of continuationist thought. John Wesley and the Methodists emphasized personal experience with the Holy Spirit, including the “baptism of the Holy Spirit.” Movements such as the Shakers, Seventh-day Adventists, and, more powerfully, the Pentecostal and Charismatic movements embraced spiritual gifts as integral to faith. Even the Catholic Church, through the Charismatic Renewal, welcomed these gifts.

The 1960s–1980s brought new waves of influence. The Charismatic Renewal spread through traditional denominations, and C. Peter Wagner coined the term “Third Wave” to describe churches embracing spiritual gifts without identifying as Pentecostal. These movements emphasized healing, prophecy, and evangelism empowered by the Spirit.

Today, theologians remain divided. Wayne Grudem, Sam Storms, and Michael L. Brown advocate for continuationism, providing biblical and historical defences. Others, like John MacArthur and Thomas Schreiner, defend cessationism, cautioning against what they see as abuses or theological error (although they do not fully deny that God can use a person to manifest spiritual gifts should God wish to, just not in the same sense as the time of the apostles but more of a ‘one off’ or ‘now and again’ position). Scholars such as D.A. Carson offer more nuanced or cautious views, acknowledging complexities in both scripture and practice.


Who’s Who in the Debate

Throughout this history, a diverse cast of characters has contributed to the discussion:

  • Ignatius of Antioch: A voice for church order, possibly alluding to spiritual insight.
  • Justin Martyr and Irenaeus: Apologists affirming the reality of spiritual gifts.
  • Montanus, Priscilla, Maximilla: Leaders of a controversial prophetic movement.
  • Tertullian: Sympathetic to Montanism, though his formal affiliation is debated.
  • Novatian, Cyprian, Dionysius: 3rd-century theologians witnessing to divine activity.
  • Augustine: Initially skeptical of miracles, later persuaded by contemporary reports.
  • Reformers: Baxter, Knox, and Rutherford resisted uniform cessationist definitions.
  • Modern voices: Grudem, Storms, Brown, MacArthur, Carson—each with a unique angle.

Conclusion

The question of spiritual gifts is not merely academic, it touches on how we relate to God, experience community, and understand the nature of Christian ministry. The historical and theological record shows that belief in the Holy Spirit’s activity has persisted, even as expressions and interpretations have evolved. Whether one holds to cessationism or continuationism, understanding the journey through history can offer clarity and perhaps humility in how we approach the Spirit’s role today.

Personally, I fall on the side that believes spiritual gifts are still active today, though not necessarily in the same way as during the time of the apostles. I’m cautious of those who travel the world claiming to possess a gift of healing, more often than not, these individuals are exposed as fraudulent. That doesn’t mean healings don’t happen; I believe they do. But when they do, it’s God who gets the praise, not the vessel. These healings draw people to seek God, not to glorify the person He may have used.

There’s evidence in the writings of the early church fathers that the gifts of the Spirit didn’t cease with the apostles, even if we hear about them less frequently as time goes on. But just because we don’t often hear about them doesn’t mean they no longer exist. That said, it’s clear that many who claim to have spiritual gifts today are false, and this can lead people to pursue an experience rather than seek the Creator Himself.

Perhaps one of the most vital gifts for our time is the gift of discernment; the ability to distinguish what is truly from God and what is not. We must test everything with Scripture and approach God in humility and prayer.

Search ESV Bible